George Clooney is in all places—onstage, onscreen, at Biden fundraisers, in Sudanese warfare zones and conveniently, on the crossroads the place Hollywood, globalism, and U.S. international coverage all the time appear to satisfy.
Most individuals see the smile. The appeal. The tailor-made fits and the well mannered outrage. However look once more. Strip away the applause and the Armani, and what you’re left with isn’t a number one man. It’s a intermediary—particularly, a intermediary for energy.
The phrase “deep state” has been distorted by overuse, turning into a cartoonish utterance. Overlook the caricature. A deep state asset is, at its core, somebody unelected but profoundly influential. Somebody who helps form public opinion whereas by no means showing on a poll.
Clooney might not carry a badge, however functionally, he’s as helpful to the equipment as anybody in Langley.
Let’s rewind 20 years. Whereas most People had been tuning out geopolitical noise, Clooney grew to become the face of intervention in Sudan. Why? As a result of Sudan was on the Pentagon’s regime-change wishlist. Proper there, below Wesley Clark’s notorious “seven nations in 5 years” plan.
Clooney didn’t problem that agenda—he helped soften it. “Good Evening, and Good Luck” was by no means only a movie. It was a mission assertion.
Clooney wasn’t content material with appearing; he wished to be seen as a public conscience. The film, centered on Edward R. Murrow’s televised showdown with Senator McCarthy, painted Clooney as a contemporary defender of fact towards state overreach.
That wasn’t an accident. It was a calculated transformation, from charming actor to trusted ethical authority. And it labored.
However the timing issues.
Shortly after burnishing his credibility with the liberal elite, Clooney launched the Satellite tv for pc Sentinel Mission—a real-world extension of that very same narrative. Solely this time, the authoritarian risk wasn’t McCarthy. It was Sudan.
And as a substitute of stories broadcasts, the medium was satellite tv for pc surveillance. This wasn’t some scrappy humanitarian enterprise. It was coverage laundering by means of movie star—a option to repackage state surveillance as civil society activism. A PR arm for U.S. intelligence pursuits, run out of Hollywood.
Basically, smooth energy with a media halo. And it by no means stopped.
From Libya to Syria to Ukraine, Clooney’s PR instincts appear wired to a State Division calendar. His documentaries, op-eds and award-show speeches all the time align with elite Atlanticist pursuits. He’s not forward of the curve. He’s the curve—prepping the general public for the subsequent ethical intervention.
When you had been watching the purple carpet, he was already within the Scenario Room—metaphorically, if not actually.
Then there’s Amal Clooney.
Their marriage isn’t just photogenic—it’s geopolitical. A merger of media energy and elite authorized infrastructure. If George is the velvet glove, Amal is the polished briefcase.
Now, fast-forward to July of final 12 months. After co-hosting the greatest Democratic fundraiser in historical past, Clooney printed a slick hit piece in The New York Occasions calling for Joe Biden to step apart. Framed as a civic obligation. Applauded as ethical readability. However make no mistake—it was regime administration. Not rebel, not resistance.
The identical man who raised thousands and thousands for Biden flipped the change simply weeks later. The general public known as it courageous. The machine known as it proper on time.
Clooney was a longtime Obama confidant and a lifetime member of CFR (Council on Overseas Relations). For these unfamiliar, the CFR isn’t a social membership. It’s the place international coverage will get soft-launched, a breeding floor for warfare architects, intelligence veterans and globalist consensus.
If a speaking level about “democracy” in some far-off oil-rich nation abruptly turns into gospel throughout networks, likelihood is it handed by means of CFR first.
Obama’s ties to the CFR helped form his international coverage doctrine—drone warfare dressed up as diplomacy, regime change sanitized with speeches. That Clooney moved in the identical circles wasn’t a coincidence. It was alignment. And alignment, on this sport, is every thing.
When the regime wants belief, it doesn’t ship a bureaucrat. It sends Clooney. When the surveillance state wants rebranding, when warfare wants an ethical gloss, when globalist coverage wants a digestible face—they don’t name Congress.
They name Clooney.
His work isn’t disruptive; it’s all the time adjoining to energy. From UN photograph ops to Davos panels, from fastidiously timed and positioned essays to Netflix documentaries, Clooney doesn’t problem the empire; he curates its picture.
He sells surveillance as compassion. He attire regime change in a black tie. And the general public eats it up—as a result of he’s humorous, self-deprecating and by no means berates.
That’s the trick. He doesn’t propagandize.
That is what elite seize seems to be like in 2025. It’s not a normal barking orders. It’s a likable actor on Colbert or Kimmel, gently nudging your worldview.
The CIA doesn’t have to launder narratives anymore. Clooney does it at no cost, and he wins awards for it.
So when “Good Evening, and Good Luck” airs reside on CNN , bear in mind: the actual drama isn’t Murrow vs. McCarthy—it’s Clooney vs. readability.
Some will cheer. Some will change the channel. However Clooney? He’ll smile, alter his cufflinks and hold doing what he does finest: making propaganda really feel like primetime.