Some motion pictures outline their style in methods time can’t contact.
Go forward and make a killer shark film. You gained’t lap 1975’s “Jaws.” The identical holds for 1973’s “The Exorcist” (possession thrillers) and 1991’s “The Silence of the Lambs” (serial killer tales).
For some time, “Longlegs” evades “Silence’s” gargantuan shadow. It helps that we don’t get a full have a look at the killer in query, and director Osgood Perkins has us within the palm of his hand.
The thriller can’t maintain that early drumbeat of dread. The movie’s ultimate moments remind us why sure movies are iconic whereas others merely tease that standing.
Maika Monroe performs Lee Harker, an FBI agent with a eager puzzle-solving model. Her boss (Blair Underwood) assigns her to research a long-running case involving mutilated households. Clues are briefly provide, however Lee’s early hunches repay in a hurray.
Hmmm.
She seems to be on the Spectrum, and her strained ties together with her mom (Alicia Witt) recommend a less-than-cheery childhood. This isn’t Clarice Starling, that’s for certain.
The extra Lee probes the case, the extra baffling it turns into. The scariest half for the younger FBI agent? The killer could also be linked to her in methods she will’t perceive.
Longlegs Director Osgood Perkins Doesn’t Watch New Horror Motion pictures https://t.co/UaMmQiwUaM
— ComingSoon.internet (@comingsoonnet) July 12, 2024
Director Perkins (son of Anthony) lets us meet the killer from the bounce. That’s Longlegs (Nicolas Cage, buried in ghastly make-up), a shambling mess of a person with a high-pitched voice. At first you’ll suppose “Longlegs” took a web page out of “Lambs’” trans playbook, nevertheless it’s merely a deeply disturbed soul out for blood.
Mockingly, the movie spills much less of it than you may count on.
We don’t get a full have a look at Longlegs immediately, and that delayed reveal is the movie’s secret weapon. We hear that voice, see these mannerisms and picture a monster from our worst nightmares. Cage does the remaining, and having his recognizable face buried beneath latex does the story a favor.
The primary half of “Longlegs” is classy, from the nonstop dread bleeding into the body to Monroe’s arrested flip as Lee. But her character by no means evolves over the story, nor can we see recent layers as her hunt marches on.
That’s not Monroe’s fault. Perkins’ script will get thinner when it needs to be taking form.
View this put up on Instagram
Serial killer tales have sure tropes, and “Longlegs” does its greatest to acknowledge and subvert them. But one key distinction appears like a cheat, damaging the movie’s crucial scenes.
Mentioned distinction can’t be revealed and not using a gargantuan “spoiler alert” warning.
Perkins takes his time setting the story in movement, and that self-discipline principally works in his favor. Later within the movie that method takes a treasured flip, just like the director places an excessive amount of religion within the story’s deliberation.
Trendy movies wrestle to stay the touchdown, and “Longlegs” is a textbook case of simply that. Mysteries are principally resolved, however they’re unsatisfying and lacking the stress so expertly organized within the first act.
The finale additionally makes poor use of Cage, who neither embraces his inside “Mandy” nor retains his pure vitality beneath wraps. The balancing act is perfection, one thing that may’t be stated of the movie itself.
HiT or Miss: “Longlegs” is a lower above most horror movies, however the story’s magnetism dims as we study extra in regards to the serial killer’s m.o.
The put up Why ‘Longlegs’ Isn’t the Subsequent ‘Silence of the Lambs’ appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.